手电大家谈-手电筒爱好者之家

 找回密码
 注册成为会员,享受更多功能。

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

只需一步,快速开始

搜索
查看: 6349|回复: 10

[电池] 老外关于amazon basic电池的评测,结论惊人

[复制链接]
  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2020-4-12 06:33
  • 签到天数: 303 天

    [LV.8]以坛为家I

    发表于 2016-11-9 11:19 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

    马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

    您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?注册成为会员,享受更多功能。

    x
    倍斯不是eneloops,是挺差的产品,
    http://thewirecutter.com/reviews/best-rechargeable-batteries/

    Are AmazonBasics just rebranded Eneloops?

    Probably not. There’s quite a lot of speculation on some sites and in some reviews that certain cheaper brands might actually be Panasonic Eneloops in disguise. Independent reviews and enthusiasts have been floating the idea that AmazonBasics Rechargeable Batteries and the High Capacity version, which are considerably cheaper than their Eneloop counterparts, are actually made by Panasonic. There’s all sorts of rumors about whether the factory that makes Eneloops contracts out to other brands since the sale from Sanyo to Panasonic. But no matter what corporate evidence someone wants to go dig up, our just tests don’t agree.

    Despite having similar measured capacity to Eneloop in the first few cycles, the AmazonBasics only powered our test flashlight for 2 hours, 12 minutes while the high-capacity version improved to 2 hours, 39 minutes. The equivalent Eneloops bested them by burning for 2 hours, 45 minutes and 2 hours, 56 minutes. Even in last year’s inconclusive camera flash tests, the AmazonBasics batteries only strobed 80 percent as many times before being completely run down. While Amazon has been churning out impressive discount products in some categories, we don’t think the AmazonBasics are a great deal for most people—especially because at a price of around $2.12 per battery, they’re not much of a deal.



    回复 dsu_marcocopyright:copyright

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情
    慵懒
    2021-8-13 17:41
  • 签到天数: 21 天

    [LV.4]偶尔看看III

    发表于 2016-11-9 11:27 | 显示全部楼层
    坐等卡帝前来科普。
    回复

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情
    奋斗
    2023-11-2 20:53
  • 签到天数: 716 天

    [LV.9]以坛为家II

    发表于 2016-11-9 12:11 | 显示全部楼层
    国产的倍思#滑稽#,狸猫换太子
    回复

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2024-4-12 12:44
  • 签到天数: 203 天

    [LV.7]常住居民III

    发表于 2016-11-9 12:21 | 显示全部楼层
    这下又要高潮了
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    该用户从未签到

    发表于 2016-11-9 12:33 | 显示全部楼层
    国外好像没卖比亚迪代工的倍思吧
    回复

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2024-4-12 12:44
  • 签到天数: 203 天

    [LV.7]常住居民III

    发表于 2016-11-9 13:02 | 显示全部楼层

    Are AmazonBasics just rebranded Eneloops?

    Probably not. There’s quite a lot of speculation on some sites and in some reviews that certain cheaper brands might actually be Panasonic Eneloops in disguise. Independent reviews and enthusiasts have been floating the idea that AmazonBasics Rechargeable Batteries and the High Capacity version, which are considerably cheaper than their Eneloop counterparts, are actually made by Panasonic. There’s all sorts of rumors about whether the factory that makes Eneloops contracts out to other brands since the sale from Sanyo to Panasonic. But no matter what corporate evidence someone wants to go dig up, our just tests don’t agree.

    Despite having similar measured capacity to Eneloop in the first few cycles, the AmazonBasics only powered our test flashlight for 2 hours, 12 minutes while the high-capacity version improved to 2 hours, 39 minutes. The equivalent Eneloops bested them by burning for 2 hours, 45 minutes and 2 hours, 56 minutes. Even in last year’s inconclusive camera flash tests, the AmazonBasics batteries only strobed 80 percent as many times before being completely run down. While Amazon has been churning out impressive discount products in some categories, we don’t think the AmazonBasics are a great deal for most people—especially because at a price of around $2.12 per battery, they’re not much of a deal.

    是amazonbasics刚刚更名eneloops?
    可能不是。有相当多的一些网站和一些评论,一些便宜的品牌可能是松下eneloops变相炒作。独立评论和爱好者已浮动的想法,amazonbasics可充电电池和高容量版本,这是相当比eneloop同行便宜,实际上是由松下。有各种各样的谣言是否让eneloops合约自从三洋到松下销售的其他品牌的工厂。但不管公司的证据有人想去挖掘,我们只是测试不同意。
    尽管有类似的测量能力,循环中的前几个周期的唯一动力,amazonbasics测试手电筒2个小时,12分钟,大容量版本提高到2小时,39分钟。等效eneloops比他们燃烧了2个小时,45分钟,2小时,56分钟。甚至在去年的不确定的相机闪光灯的电池测试,amazonbasics只选通百分之80多次被压垮了。虽然亚马逊已经推出令人印象深刻的折扣产品在某些类别中,我们不认为amazonbasics大量特别是大多数人因为价格在2.12美元的电池,他们没有太多的处理。
    回复

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情
    擦汗
    2022-8-2 15:29
  • 签到天数: 10 天

    [LV.3]偶尔看看II

    发表于 2016-11-9 14:27 | 显示全部楼层
    对于 35内阻的电池,表现如此不奇怪。
    eneloop 才 20多。
    回复

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2020-8-6 09:55
  • 签到天数: 59 天

    [LV.5]常住居民I

    发表于 2016-11-9 17:00 | 显示全部楼层
    二等品质的爱乐普啊。。
    回复

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情

    2019-12-25 09:23
  • 签到天数: 444 天

    [LV.9]以坛为家II

    发表于 2016-11-9 19:23 | 显示全部楼层
    本来就是定制款,当然各方面性能都要差一些的!
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    该用户从未签到

    发表于 2016-11-10 21:40 | 显示全部楼层
    老外怀疑是二次转包给其他厂做的
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    该用户从未签到

    发表于 2016-11-11 16:26 | 显示全部楼层
    这是美国人的测评?看到最后提到了美元,美亚上买的黑皮倍思是日本产的还是中国产的啊
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    本版积分规则

    小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|论坛自带搜索|下载论坛app|手电大家谈-手电筒爱好者之家 ( 备案序号:鲁ICP备05002565号 )
    以上言论纯属个人观点,与手电大家谈立场无关。
    最佳浏览模式:1920*1080


    GMT+8, 2024-6-4 11:15 , Processed in 0.193120 second(s), 44 queries , Gzip On.

    Powered by Discuz! X3.4

    © 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

    快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表