gogolebot 发表于 2016-11-9 11:19

老外关于amazon basic电池的评测,结论惊人

倍斯不是eneloops,是挺差的产品,
http://thewirecutter.com/reviews/best-rechargeable-batteries/

Are AmazonBasics just rebranded Eneloops?

Probably not. There’s quite a lot of speculation on some sites and in some reviews that certain cheaper brands might actually be Panasonic Eneloops in disguise. Independent reviews and enthusiasts have been floating the idea that AmazonBasics Rechargeable Batteries and the High Capacity version, which are considerably cheaper than their Eneloop counterparts, are actually made by Panasonic. There’s all sorts of rumors about whether the factory that makes Eneloops contracts out to other brands since the sale from Sanyo to Panasonic. But no matter what corporate evidence someone wants to go dig up, our just tests don’t agree.

Despite having similar measured capacity to Eneloop in the first few cycles, the AmazonBasics only powered our test flashlight for 2 hours, 12 minutes while the high-capacity version improved to 2 hours, 39 minutes. The equivalent Eneloops bested them by burning for 2 hours, 45 minutes and 2 hours, 56 minutes. Even in last year’s inconclusive camera flash tests, the AmazonBasics batteries only strobed 80 percent as many times before being completely run down. While Amazon has been churning out impressive discount products in some categories, we don’t think the AmazonBasics are a great deal for most people—especially because at a price of around $2.12 per battery, they’re not much of a deal.


penetrating 发表于 2016-11-9 11:27

坐等卡帝前来科普。

18650充电锂电池 发表于 2016-11-9 12:11

国产的倍思#滑稽#,狸猫换太子

sdboboda 发表于 2016-11-9 12:21

这下又要高潮了

allac 发表于 2016-11-9 12:33

国外好像没卖比亚迪代工的倍思吧{:5_627:}

sdboboda 发表于 2016-11-9 13:02


Are AmazonBasics just rebranded Eneloops?

Probably not. There’s quite a lot of speculation on some sites and in some reviews that certain cheaper brands might actually be Panasonic Eneloops in disguise. Independent reviews and enthusiasts have been floating the idea that AmazonBasics Rechargeable Batteries and the High Capacity version, which are considerably cheaper than their Eneloop counterparts, are actually made by Panasonic. There’s all sorts of rumors about whether the factory that makes Eneloops contracts out to other brands since the sale from Sanyo to Panasonic. But no matter what corporate evidence someone wants to go dig up, our just tests don’t agree.

Despite having similar measured capacity to Eneloop in the first few cycles, the AmazonBasics only powered our test flashlight for 2 hours, 12 minutes while the high-capacity version improved to 2 hours, 39 minutes. The equivalent Eneloops bested them by burning for 2 hours, 45 minutes and 2 hours, 56 minutes. Even in last year’s inconclusive camera flash tests, the AmazonBasics batteries only strobed 80 percent as many times before being completely run down. While Amazon has been churning out impressive discount products in some categories, we don’t think the AmazonBasics are a great deal for most people—especially because at a price of around $2.12 per battery, they’re not much of a deal.

是amazonbasics刚刚更名eneloops?
可能不是。有相当多的一些网站和一些评论,一些便宜的品牌可能是松下eneloops变相炒作。独立评论和爱好者已浮动的想法,amazonbasics可充电电池和高容量版本,这是相当比eneloop同行便宜,实际上是由松下。有各种各样的谣言是否让eneloops合约自从三洋到松下销售的其他品牌的工厂。但不管公司的证据有人想去挖掘,我们只是测试不同意。
尽管有类似的测量能力,循环中的前几个周期的唯一动力,amazonbasics测试手电筒2个小时,12分钟,大容量版本提高到2小时,39分钟。等效eneloops比他们燃烧了2个小时,45分钟,2小时,56分钟。甚至在去年的不确定的相机闪光灯的电池测试,amazonbasics只选通百分之80多次被压垮了。虽然亚马逊已经推出令人印象深刻的折扣产品在某些类别中,我们不认为amazonbasics大量特别是大多数人因为价格在2.12美元的电池,他们没有太多的处理。

Prophet 发表于 2016-11-9 14:27

对于 35内阻的电池,表现如此不奇怪。
eneloop 才 20多。

McPrinz 发表于 2016-11-9 17:00

二等品质的爱乐普啊。。

chenqiocean 发表于 2016-11-9 19:23

本来就是定制款,当然各方面性能都要差一些的!

kieslowski 发表于 2016-11-10 21:40

老外怀疑是二次转包给其他厂做的

shakermaker1 发表于 2016-11-11 16:26

这是美国人的测评?看到最后提到了美元,美亚上买的黑皮倍思是日本产的还是中国产的啊
页: [1]
查看完整版本: 老外关于amazon basic电池的评测,结论惊人